Article 485

The share in benefits and changes in proportional to the interest of each. Hence, if one co-owner two thirds, he share two third of taxes. Contrary stipulation is void.To do so would be to run against the nature of co-ownership.Each co-owners share proportionately in the accretion on alluvium of the property.This is because an increase in area benefits all in taxes,if a co-owner has paid the taxes to prevent or feature of the common property for tax delinquency, he could compel contribution from his co-owners. But if he has not yet paid Article 481
Some rules of procedure as Enunciated by American courts. The verve of the action is determined by the situation or location of the premises, and not by the residence of the party. The process or notice should accurately describe the property and state in general terms the nature and extent of the plaintiff's claim. The suit cannot be brought in the name of the party for the use and benefits of another. Problems; A died intestate leaving in debts and no administrator of the state. During lifetime, A executed an invalid mortgage with B. May the heirs of A bring an action to cancel the deed of mortgage because it is valid and a cloud on their title? the answer would be, yes where one dies in the manner set forth above, all the heirs of the decent may jointly maintain an action to cancel a deed of their ancestor, upon the ground that it is illegal and void and is cloud upon their title.